|
GASB #34: Problems and Solutions
During Implementation
Presented by: Bert Nuehring FPT&W, Ltd. Chicago, Oak Brook,
Springfield www.fptw.com |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Click here to download the document in Microsoft Word 2000 GASB 34 Questions and Answers, May 14, 2003
Yes, in order for your auditors to opine on the cash basis of accounting for your separately issued stand alone financial statements, they are required to follow the standards related to an “other comprehensive basis of accounting.” These standards require that financial statements be audited to determine that they are presented with all disclosures that are necessary in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. GASB 34 is generally accepted accounting principle, therefore, a cash basis financial report would be required to be presented in the format of GASB 34 and to include all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles.
The guidance available from the ISBE regarding GASB 34 suggests that school districts will not be required to implement GASB 34. If a district chooses not to implement GASB 34, the annual financial report can be utilized as a regulatory financial report. The auditor will then need to issue a regulatory report on the Annual Financial Report (AFR). If a school district follows the GASB 34 format they would still be required to prepare and submit an AFR (similar to current format) with an auditor opinion on the regulatory basis of accounting. However, developments at ISBE will need to be monitored because of recent comments attributed to the State Superintendent regarding having school districts follow GASB 34 requirements; though GASB 34 requirements will likely require legislative changes before required implementation.
A district could get an unqualified opinion on the regulatory basis of accounting as a limited use report. A limited use report would have to restrict the reliance on the report to the District and the ISBE. However, if the auditor is aware that the report may be used by parties other than the District or the ISBE, then the auditor is required to first issue an adverse opinion on the financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Then the auditor can issue an unqualified opinion in accordance with the regulatory basis of accounting as a limited use report. An auditor would probably need to consider that a District’s financial statements are used by additional parties when a Single Audit is required or when there is outstanding bonded debt or other debt.
Noncompliance with GASB 34 would result in an adverse opinion on the district’s financial statements. An adverse opinion states the “…financial statements are not presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles…” The impact on an entity with an adverse opinion on the financial statements could mean a lower credit rating and negative publicity.
No. GASB did not prescribe or require minimum standards for policies related to capital assets. Each entity is required to disclose its capital asset policies in the notes to the financial statements.
No. GASB does not prescribe threshold amounts for the capitalization of assets.
It is recommended that consideration be made for maintaining a ledger for accounting purposes and another ledger for property control purposes. The accounting ledger would maintain information regarding assets capitalized according to the accounting policy. A separate property control ledger will use a lower threshold. This ledger will be used for property control and insurance purposes.
Generally, GASB 34 requires that program revenues meet the following definitions: Program revenues derive directly form the program itself or from parties outside the district’s taxpayers or citizenry. There are three categories of program revenues:
Specifically, some of the following revenues by source could be considered as program revenues:
The working cash fun would likely be considered a special revenue fund under GASB 34.
It will be presented as a Fiduciary fund type, pension trust fund.
No. GASB 34 indicates that following requirements for proprietary funds:
Proprietary enterprise funds may be used
to report any activity for which a fee is charged to external users for
goods or services. Activities are required to be reported as enterprise
funds if any one of the following criteria is met. Governments should
apply each of these criteria in the context of the activity’s principal
revenue sources: b. Laws or regulations that the activity’s costs of providing services be recovered with fees and charges, rather than with taxes or similar revenues. c. The pricing policies of the activity establish fees and charges designed to recover its cost, including depreciation and other overhead.
· Property taxes should be recorded according to GASB 33. Receivables and deferred revenue should be recorded when passed by the Board. · Corporate personal property tax should be recorded according to GASB 33, example 5, when the tax is measurable and available. · Depreciation should be recorded in the GFAAG. Capitalization thresholds are as follows: o $2,500-$5,000 o For remodeling that extends the life of a building: $50,000-$100,000 · Useful life guidelines: o Buildings: 40-60 years o Land Improvements: 10-20 years o Equipment: 5-10 years o Technology related software and hardware: 3-5 years o Vehicles: 3-5 years · Acceptable depreciation methods: o Straight line o Double declining balance o Sum of the years digits · Summer school revenue and expense should be reported in the subsequent fiscal year. · Recommend the BTA model. IF BTA is not used, ICCB requires BTA as supplemental information for any other model. · The consolidation financial reporting method should be used for GASB 35 reporting. · Elimination and adjustment entries should be made in the consolidated statement: o Elimination of internal service charges and equivalent expenditures o Funds to be provided should be eliminated from the LTDAG o Interfund due to/from should be netted o Scholarships and Pell grants provided for tuition and fees should offset tuition revenues as an allowance.
There are number of sources of guidance related to the implementation of GASB 34. Some of those sources include the following: · Association of School Business Officials – 703-478-0405 o GASB Statement No. 34, Implementation Recommendations for School Districts o Implementing GASB 34 · Government Finance Officer’s Association – 312-977-9700 o GAAFR o An Elected Official’s Guide to GASB 34 · Government Accounting Standards Board – 203-847-0700 o Guide to Implementation of GASB Statement 34 and Related Pronouncements o Guide to Implementation of GASB 34 on Basic Financial Statements – and Management’s Discussion and Analysis – for State and Local Governments o GASB Statement No. 33, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Nonexchange Transactions o GASB Statement No. 34, Basic Financial Statements – and Management’s Discussion and Analysis – for State and Local Governments o GASB Statement No. 34, Implementation Guides, (Vol. 1 and 2) o GASB Statement No, 35, Basic Financial Statements – and Management’s Discussion and Analysis – for Public Colleges and Universities – an amendment of GASB Statement No. 34 o GASB Statement No. 36, Recipient Reporting for Certain Shared Nonexchange Revenues – an amendment of GASB Statement No. 33 o GASB Statement No. 37, Basic Financial Statements – and Management’s Discussion and Analysis – for State and Local Governments: Omnibus-an amendment of GASB Statements No. 21 and No. 34 · National Association of College and University Business Officers – 202-861-2500 o GASB 35 Implementation Guide |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||